Open data
State of the New Zealand company register
A free, open read of the whole New Zealand company register — what it holds, how formation and failure have moved, and which industries carry the most risk. The register is public but hard to see in aggregate, so we pull it together here as a service to the people who work with it. Every figure comes from the official Companies and Insolvency registers, with the method behind each one set out below.
Figures as at 1 July 2026 , and refreshed each month. Download the aggregate figures
What the register actually is
The register is much larger than the economy it records: most entities ever incorporated have since been removed, and not all of those that remain are active businesses. These figures set the scale for what follows.
“Active” means currently on the register; “removed” covers companies struck off or dissolved over its whole history. GST registration and a website are shown only where the register records them — plenty of trading companies have neither on file, so read those two as a floor, not a full count.
Not all of these are trading businesses
Around one active company in ten appears to be a holding vehicle — the kind a law or accounting firm registers for a family trust or a nominee arrangement, rather than an operating business. Set alongside how few carry an outward sign of trading, it’s a reminder that the headline company count isn’t a count of businesses.
A bar chart comparing the share of active companies that are trustee/nominee-held, GST-registered, or have a website is drawn here when charts are available. The figures are in the tiles above and the table below.
The bars don’t sum — a company can be more than one. “Trustee or nominee-held” only catches holders whose name says so, and plenty of real businesses have no GST or website on file, so treat these as rough scale rather than a clean split.
Formations hold steady; insolvent failures have climbed
New incorporations run at a fairly flat 12,000–16,000 a quarter. Insolvent liquidations — companies wound up because they can’t pay their debts — are a much smaller number on a different scale, which is why they sit in their own panel below rather than sharing an axis. We count only insolvent liquidations here: solvent members’ liquidations, where a healthy company is wound up deliberately, are excluded, because lumping them in overstates distress.
Two quarterly series — incorporations and insolvent liquidations — are drawn here when charts are available. The figures are in the table further down.
Reading the rise honestly. The jump looks dramatic if you measure from the COVID trough in late 2021, when liquidations briefly fell to around 200 a quarter. Against the more normal 2018–19 level of roughly 400 a quarter, recent quarters are closer to double, not quadruple. And the increase is concentrated in older companies working through a backlog — the number of young companies failing has barely changed even as the register itself has grown. It is a real rise, but it is not a wave of new-business collapse.
Most companies aren’t liquidated — they’re quietly struck off
Insolvent liquidation is only a small part of how companies leave the register. Each year tens of thousands are removed, but only a couple of thousand are wound up as insolvent — the rest are struck off, usually for not filing after they’ve stopped trading. The failure figures on this page cover roughly one company in twenty that leaves; the other nineteen go without any insolvency process.
A grouped bar chart of removals against insolvent liquidations per year is drawn here when charts are available. The figures are in the table below.
Read the level, not the wiggles. When a company is removed is partly an administrative matter — the Registrar runs periodic strike-off campaigns, so annual removal totals are lumpy in a way that doesn’t track the economy. The lasting point is the size gap between the two bars, not any single year’s move.
Which industries fail most
Not every industry carries the same risk. Setting insolvent liquidations against the number of active companies in each industry gives a rate that’s comparable across sectors of very different sizes. Hospitality and construction come out where you’d expect — several times the rate of professional or financial services.
A ranked bar chart of liquidation rate by industry is drawn here when charts are available. The figures are in the table further down.
What this rate can and can’t say. The industry code and the company count both come from the live register, so the rate reflects companies still trading, not ones already removed — it reads as current risk by industry rather than a full historical rate. Industry is recorded for about 78% of active companies, and a handful of very small industries are left out because a few cases would swing their rate wildly. It describes an industry, not any one company. And because it counts only liquidations, an industry where companies tend to leave quietly — stopping filing and being struck off rather than formally wound up — will look safer here than it really is. We can’t yet separate those out: the register drops a company’s industry once it’s removed, so the trades most prone to silent exit are exactly the ones this chart can’t fully see.
One-director companies fail at more than twice the rate
Board size turns out to be one of the clearest structural signals in the register. Among limited companies incorporated over 2010–2022, those with a single director are currently in liquidation at around two and a half times the rate of those with two or more — and the rate keeps falling as directors are added. A second name on the board tends to mean a co-owner, an outside investor or simply someone else watching the books.
A bar chart of the in-liquidation rate by director count is drawn here when charts are available. The figures are in the table below.
A pattern across the register, not a verdict on any company — plenty of sound businesses run with one director, and this is a snapshot of who is in liquidation now, not the odds a given company fails. It counts current directors on live limited companies, so it can’t reach back to the boards of companies already gone.
Failures peak at four to five years, not year one
You might expect most companies to fail in their first year or two. Not by liquidation: a business that folds that fast is usually just struck off, never formally wound up. Insolvent liquidations peak at four to five years — long enough to have taken on staff, leases and credit — then tail off.
A histogram of company age at insolvent liquidation is drawn here when charts are available. The figures are in the table below.
A distribution, not a hazard rate. These are counts of failures by age over a recent window, not the odds that a company of a given age fails — there are far more young companies than old ones. Very early failures are undercounted here because a company struck off in its first year or two never appears as a liquidation at all.
The five-year failure rate has been drifting down
Against the recent rise in the raw number of liquidations, the underlying five-year failure rate has been drifting down. Of companies incorporated in 2001, about one in forty was insolvent-liquidated within five years; for the 2018 cohort it was closer to one in a hundred. Following whole cohorts from birth removes the survivorship problem that dogs most register statistics.
A line chart of the five-year liquidation rate by incorporation year is drawn here when charts are available. The figures are in the table below.
The series stops a few years back — a cohort needs a full five years before its rate can be measured. The earliest cohorts also sit near the start of the electronic insolvency record, so the first years carry more uncertainty.
Half of every cohort is gone within a decade — almost all of it quietly
The charts above each take one slice of failure. This one follows every limited company incorporated since 2001 from the day it was registered, and asks what has become of it at each age. By five years about seven in ten are still on the register; by ten, only half. Of those that have gone, though, the great majority were struck off rather than liquidated — the thin band along the bottom is formal insolvency, and it never climbs past a few percent. And most of those quiet exits aren’t failures at all: the owner retires, the company has finished the one job it was set up for — holding a property that’s since been sold, say — or the business simply stops filing. The kind of failure the rest of this page measures is the rare way out.
A stacked-area chart splitting each age into companies still on the register, quietly removed, and formally liquidated is drawn here when charts are available. The figures are in the table below.
This pools every cohort from 2001 on rather than tracking the trend between them — the cohort chart above is the place to read change over time. Because each company is followed from incorporation, no company is assumed to have survived a period it hasn’t actually reached, so there’s no survivorship bias; the trade-off is that ages past fifteen or so rest on the earliest cohorts only. And when a company is removed is partly administrative — it often stops trading well before the Registrar strikes it off — so read the removed band as where companies leave the register, not the moment they stopped operating.
Show these figures as a table
| Quarter | Incorporations | Insolvent liquidations |
|---|---|---|
| 2018-Q1 | 13,818 | 435 |
| 2018-Q2 | 15,635 | 437 |
| 2018-Q3 | 14,796 | 471 |
| 2018-Q4 | 12,462 | 376 |
| 2019-Q1 | 12,992 | 352 |
| 2019-Q2 | 14,365 | 403 |
| 2019-Q3 | 13,944 | 413 |
| 2019-Q4 | 12,109 | 362 |
| 2020-Q1 | 12,508 | 348 |
| 2020-Q2 | 13,438 | 289 |
| 2020-Q3 | 17,393 | 314 |
| 2020-Q4 | 15,280 | 268 |
| 2021-Q1 | 16,946 | 260 |
| 2021-Q2 | 17,469 | 299 |
| 2021-Q3 | 16,099 | 307 |
| 2021-Q4 | 14,537 | 207 |
| 2022-Q1 | 14,704 | 245 |
| 2022-Q2 | 14,138 | 225 |
| 2022-Q3 | 13,887 | 374 |
| 2022-Q4 | 11,890 | 420 |
| 2023-Q1 | 13,852 | 329 |
| 2023-Q2 | 15,540 | 404 |
| 2023-Q3 | 14,560 | 454 |
| 2023-Q4 | 12,197 | 406 |
| 2024-Q1 | 13,991 | 436 |
| 2024-Q2 | 14,921 | 581 |
| 2024-Q3 | 14,143 | 654 |
| 2024-Q4 | 12,635 | 609 |
| 2025-Q1 | 14,660 | 580 |
| 2025-Q2 | 15,960 | 624 |
| 2025-Q3 | 16,110 | 645 |
| 2025-Q4 | 14,166 | 862 |
| 2026-Q1 | 15,813 | 633 |
| 2026-Q2 | 16,353 | 662 |
| Industry (ANZSIC division) | Active companies | Liquidations | Per 1,000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accommodation & food services | 29,388 | 434 | 14.77 |
| Transport, postal & warehousing | 15,392 | 170 | 11.04 |
| Construction | 74,516 | 821 | 11.02 |
| Other services | 24,801 | 172 | 6.94 |
| Manufacturing | 24,790 | 143 | 5.77 |
| Retail trade | 41,196 | 225 | 5.46 |
| Wholesale trade | 19,511 | 93 | 4.77 |
| Arts & recreation services | 8,914 | 39 | 4.38 |
| Administrative & support services | 27,554 | 115 | 4.17 |
| Information media & telecommunications | 11,283 | 43 | 3.81 |
| Agriculture, forestry & fishing | 26,829 | 87 | 3.24 |
| Rental, hiring & real estate | 95,069 | 297 | 3.12 |
| Professional, scientific & technical | 84,762 | 219 | 2.58 |
| Education & training | 10,139 | 24 | 2.37 |
| Health care & social assistance | 17,064 | 38 | 2.23 |
| Financial & insurance services | 69,659 | 92 | 1.32 |
| Age at failure | Liquidations |
|---|---|
| 0–1 years | 614 |
| 2–3 years | 1,958 |
| 4–5 years | 2,210 |
| 6–7 years | 1,688 |
| 8–9 years | 1,184 |
| 10–13 years | 1,236 |
| 14–19 years | 1,016 |
| 20+ years | 891 |
| Incorporated | Companies | Failed in 5 yrs | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 37,653 | 814 | 2.16% |
| 2002 | 47,513 | 889 | 1.87% |
| 2003 | 58,639 | 911 | 1.55% |
| 2004 | 61,221 | 1,073 | 1.75% |
| 2005 | 64,709 | 1,209 | 1.87% |
| 2006 | 68,005 | 1,257 | 1.85% |
| 2007 | 70,575 | 1,261 | 1.79% |
| 2008 | 53,652 | 867 | 1.62% |
| 2009 | 48,551 | 808 | 1.66% |
| 2010 | 45,381 | 712 | 1.57% |
| 2011 | 42,528 | 679 | 1.60% |
| 2012 | 44,214 | 670 | 1.52% |
| 2013 | 45,715 | 754 | 1.65% |
| 2014 | 49,217 | 750 | 1.52% |
| 2015 | 52,697 | 686 | 1.30% |
| 2016 | 58,538 | 643 | 1.10% |
| 2017 | 58,274 | 607 | 1.04% |
| 2018 | 56,711 | 503 | 0.89% |
| 2019 | 53,410 | 542 | 1.01% |
| 2020 | 58,619 | 664 | 1.13% |
| Year | Removed | Insolvent liquidations |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 39,649 | 2,039 |
| 2016 | 50,139 | 1,849 |
| 2017 | 42,510 | 1,659 |
| 2018 | 32,945 | 1,719 |
| 2019 | 29,595 | 1,530 |
| 2020 | 30,526 | 1,219 |
| 2021 | 38,202 | 1,073 |
| 2022 | 41,123 | 1,264 |
| 2023 | 41,363 | 1,593 |
| 2024 | 48,969 | 2,280 |
| 2025 | 50,137 | 2,711 |
| Directors | Companies | In liquidation | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 227,356 | 2,966 | 1.30% |
| 2 | 117,563 | 639 | 0.54% |
| 3 | 17,662 | 69 | 0.39% |
| 4+ | 12,406 | 38 | 0.31% |
| Age (years) | Still at risk | Still on register | Liquidated | Silently removed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1,393,342 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 1 | 1,310,297 | 98.5% | 0.1% | 1.5% |
| 2 | 1,133,884 | 89.1% | 0.3% | 10.5% |
| 3 | 999,781 | 82.2% | 0.7% | 17.1% |
| 4 | 887,405 | 76.4% | 1.1% | 22.5% |
| 5 | 781,766 | 71.0% | 1.4% | 27.5% |
| 6 | 681,040 | 66.1% | 1.8% | 32.1% |
| 7 | 600,311 | 61.6% | 2.1% | 36.4% |
| 8 | 526,102 | 57.4% | 2.3% | 40.2% |
| 9 | 459,110 | 53.7% | 2.6% | 43.7% |
| 10 | 398,736 | 50.3% | 2.7% | 47.0% |
| 11 | 346,307 | 47.2% | 2.9% | 49.9% |
| 12 | 302,738 | 44.5% | 3.0% | 52.5% |
| 13 | 265,090 | 42.1% | 3.1% | 54.8% |
| 14 | 233,190 | 39.9% | 3.2% | 56.9% |
| 15 | 205,472 | 38.0% | 3.3% | 58.7% |
| 16 | 180,852 | 36.2% | 3.3% | 60.4% |
| 17 | 156,957 | 34.6% | 3.4% | 62.0% |
| 18 | 134,837 | 33.1% | 3.4% | 63.5% |
| 19 | 111,131 | 31.6% | 3.5% | 65.0% |
| 20 | 85,983 | 30.2% | 3.5% | 66.3% |
Method and limits
- Sources. The Companies Register and the Insolvency Register, both from the New Zealand Companies Office. No other agency’s data is used on this page.
- Failure means insolvent liquidation. We use the insolvency record, not company removals — most companies leaving the register are struck off quietly, not liquidated, so removals are a poor measure of failure. Solvent members’ liquidations are excluded throughout.
- One case, not one appointment. A liquidation with more than one appointed practitioner is counted once, so joint appointments don’t inflate the totals.
- The failure series starts in 2018. The register’s electronic insolvency record only becomes reliable around 2001, and we show recent years where the picture is clearest.
- The survival curve follows whole cohorts. It tracks every limited company incorporated since 2001 from birth and splits each age between liquidation, removal and still-registered using a standard competing-risks method (Aalen–Johansen), which accounts properly for companies too young to have reached the older ages — so it carries no survivorship bias. The split of the quiet-removal exits by industry is deliberately not shown: the register drops a company’s industry code when it’s removed, so that breakdown can’t be measured.
- Aggregates only. Everything here is a register-wide total or rate. Nothing on this page scores or judges an individual company, and no figure is drawn from what Legible’s own users look up.
- Updated monthly from each new register snapshot. The as-at date above tells you which one.
Legible is a research aid built on the public registers. It doesn’t provide credit scores, financial advice, or AML/CFT certification. See our service disclosure for the data-use commitments behind figures like these.